These propositions or premises were either provided as facts or simply taken as assumptions. For instance: Socrates is a man. All men are mortal. The logic behind finding a reasoning based on a proposition and an inference that has something common with the said proposition is pretty straightforward. However, in the post-Renaissance era leading up to the modern age we came up with logical approaches that were based more on mathematical deductions and were far more accurate and less on the uncertainty of non-plausible premises.
In his book, Historia Animalium or History of Animals, Aristotle was the first person in human history to venture into the classification of different animals. He used traits that are common among certain animals to classify them into similar groups. For example, based on the presence of blood, he created two different groups such as animals with blood and animals without blood.
Similarly, based on their habitat, he classified animals as ones that live in water and ones that live on land. In his perspective, life had a hierarchical make-up and all living beings could be grouped in this hierarchy based on their position from lowest to highest.
He placed the human species highest in this hierarchy. He also devised the binomial nomenclature. The difference is what makes the living organism different to other members of the family it falls within. Aristotle is also known as the Father of Zoology. As evident from his classification of living beings, all his classification procedures and several other treatises primarily involved different species of the animal kingdom only. However, he wrote a number of treatises that revolved around different aspects of zoology as well.
Some of his popular treatises such as History of Animals, Movement of Animals, Progression of Animals and others were based on the study of different land, water, and aerial animals.
Unlike his predecessors who merely documented their routine observations of nature, Aristotle worked on outlining specific techniques that he would use to make specific observations. Using his observations, he was able to study the detailed growth of different organs as the embryo developed into a fully-hatched youngling. It is true that while Aristotle established new frontiers in the field of life sciences, his ventures into physics fall short by comparison.
His studies in physics seem to have been highly influenced by pre-established ideas of contemporary and earlier Greek thinkers. His contributions were a giant leap forward from the pre-scientific era psychology that went before him and led us into an age of far more precise qualitative and quantitative analysis.
However, we cannot shy away from sharing his magnificent contributions. It represents the best-known work on ethics by Aristotle: a collection of ten books based on notes taken from his various lectures at the Lyceum. Aristotelian ethics outline the different social and behavioural virtues of an ideal man. Being a citizen of a polis was essential for a person to lead a good-quality life.
Attaining this status meant that a citizen needed to make necessary political connections to secure permanent residence. His progressive adventures in the biology of natural flora and fauna are quite visible in the naturalism of his politics. He divides the polis and its respective constitutions into six categories, of which three he judges to be good and the remaining three bad. In his view, the good ones are constitutional government, aristocracy, and kingship, and the bad ones include democracy, oligarchy, and tyranny.
He believes that the political valuation of an individual directly depends on their contributions in making the life of their polis better. However, as Aristotle became famous he gathered several monikers. Aristotle started a school in Lyceum known as Peripatetic school. Discover Walks contributors speak from all corners of the world - from Prague to Bangkok, Barcelona to Nairobi.
We may all come from different walks of life but we have one common passion - learning through travel. Whether you want to learn the history of a city, or you simply need a recommendation for your next meal, Discover Walks Team offers an ever-growing travel encyclopaedia.
Poetics is a scientific study of writing and poetry where Aristotle observes, analyzes and defines mostly tragedy and epic poetry. Compared to philosophy, which presents ideas, poetry is an imitative use of language, rhythm and harmony that represents objects and events in the world, Aristotle posited. His book explores the foundation of storymaking, including character development, plot and storyline.
That said, it was up to the individual to reason cautiously while developing his or her own judgment. While bad luck can affect happiness, a truly happy person, he believed, learns to cultivate habits and behaviors that help him or her to keep bad luck in perspective.
In his book Metaphysics , Aristotle clarified the distinction between matter and form. To Aristotle, matter was the physical substance of things, while form was the unique nature of a thing that gave it its identity. In Politics , Aristotle examined human behavior in the context of society and government. Aristotle believed the purpose of government was make it possible for citizens to achieve virtue and happiness.
Intended to help guide statesmen and rulers, Politics explores, among other themes, how and why cities come into being; the roles of citizens and politicians; wealth and the class system; the purpose of the political system; types of governments and democracies; and the roles of slavery and women in the household and society. In Rhetoric , Aristotle observes and analyzes public speaking with scientific rigor in order to teach readers how to be more effective speakers.
Aristotle believed rhetoric was essential in politics and law and helped defend truth and justice. Good rhetoric, Aristotle believed, could educate people and encourage them to consider both sides of a debate.
These sorts of relationships were visually grafted in the future through the use of Venn diagrams. In these works, Aristotle discusses his system for reasoning and for developing sound arguments. Aristotle composed works on astronomy, including On the Heavens , and earth sciences, including Meteorology. Although many of his views on the Earth were controversial at the time, they were re-adopted and popularized during the late Middle Ages.
In the second case, one does what one wants to do and is thus to be blamed for the action. Given that badness is a form of ignorance about what one should do, it is reasonable to ask whether acting acratically, that is, doing what one does not want to do, just comes down to being ignorant. This is the teaching of Socrates, who, arguing against what appears to be the case, reduced acrasia to ignorance EN b25— Though Aristotle holds that acrasia is distinct from ignorance, he also thinks it is impossible for knowledge to be dragged around by the passions like a slave.
In other words, he admits that the passions can overpower perceptual knowledge of particulars but denies that it can dominate intellectual knowledge of universals. Acrasia consists, then, in being unruled with respect to thumos or with respect to sensory pleasures. In this sense, acrasia represents a conflict between the reasoning and unreasoning parts of the psyche for discussion see Weinman , 95— Thus, the good life may be accompanied not only by a pleasurable relation to oneself but also by relationships to others in which one takes a contemplative pleasure in their activities.
The value of friendship follows from the ideas that when a person is a friend to himself, he wishes the good for himself and thus to improve his own character.
Only such a person who has a healthy love of self can form a friendship with another person EN b25— However, because people are by nature communal or political, in order to lead a complete life, one needs to form friendships with excellent people, and it is in living together with others that one comes to lead a happy life. Friendship is a bridging concept between ethics concerning the relations of individuals and political science, which concerns the nature and function of the state.
For Aristotle, friendship holds a state together, so the lawgiver must focus on promoting friendship above all else EN a22— Indeed, when people are friends, they treat one another with mutual respect so that justice is unnecessary or redundant EN a27— Such love of others and mutual pleasure are strictly speaking neither egoistic nor altruistic.
Instead, they rest on the establishment of a harmony of self and others in which the completion of the individual life and the life of the community amount to the same thing.
This is shown by the fact that the individual human being is dependent on the political community for his formation and survival. One who lives outside the state is either a beast or a god, that is, does not participate in what is common to humanity Pol. The political community is natural and essentially human, then, because it is only within this community that the individual realizes his nature as a human being.
Thus, the state exists not only for the continuation of life but for the sake of the good life Pol. While other gregarious animals have voice, which nature has fashioned to indicate pleasure and pain, the power of speech enables human beings to indicate not only this but also what is expedient and inexpedient and what is just and unjust Pol.
However, the formal cause, the distinctive way in which symbols are organized, is conventional. This allows for a variability of constitutions and hence the establishment of good or bad laws. Thus, although the state is natural for human beings, the specific form it takes depends on the wisdom of the legislator. Though the various forms of constitution cannot be discussed here for discussion, see Clayton, Aristotle: Politics , the purpose of the state is the good of all the citizens Pol. This human thriving is most possible, however, when the political community is ruled not by an individual but by laws themselves.
Although this is the best kind of political community, Aristotle does not say that the best life for an individual is necessarily the political life.
Instead he leaves open the possibility that the theoretical life, in which philosophy is pursued for its own sake, is the best way for a person to live. The establishment of any political community depends on the existence of the sub-political sphere of the household, the productive unit in which goods are produced for consumption. Whereas the political sphere is a sphere of freedom and action, the household consists of relations of domination: that of the master and slave, that of marriage, and that of procreation.
Crucial to this household production is the slave, which Aristotle defines as a living tool Pol. As household management, economics is concerned primarily with structuring slave labor, that is, with organizing the instruments of production so as to make property necessary for the superior, political life. Aristotle thus offers a staunch defense of the institution of slavery.
Against those who claim that slavery is contrary to nature, Aristotle argues that there are natural slaves, humans who are born to be ruled by others Pol. This can be seen by analogy: the body is the natural slave of the psyche, such that a good person exerts a despotic rule over his body.
In the same way, humans ought to rule over other animals, males over females, and masters over slaves Pol. But this is only natural when the ruling part is more noble than the part that is ruled. Thus, the enslavement of the children of conquered nobles by victors in a war is a mere convention since the children may possess the natures of free people. For Aristotle, then, slavery is natural and just only when it is in the interest of slave and master alike Pol.
As noted in the biographical section, Aristotle had close ties to the expanding Macedonian empire. Thus his political philosophy, insofar as it is prescriptive of how a political community should be managed, might have been intended to be put into practice in the colonies established by Alexander. Aristotle and Plato were the most influential philosophers in antiquity, both because their works were widely circulated and read and because the schools they founded continued to exert influence for hundreds of years after their deaths.
Many of their commentaries have been edited and translated into English as part of the Ancient Commentators on Aristotle project. In the Jewish philosophical tradition, Maimonides calls Aristotle the chief of the philosophers and uses Aristotelian concepts to analyze the contents of the Hebrew Bible.
Indeed, a major controversy broke out at the University of Paris in the s between the Averroists—followers of Ibn Rushd who believed that thinking happens through divine illumination—and those who held that the active intellect is individual in humans see McInerny Beginning in the sixteenth century, the scholastics came under attack, particularly from natural philosophers, often leading to the disparagement of Aristotelian positions.
Hobbes critiqued the theory of perception, which he believed unrealistically described forms or ideas as travelling through the air. Later, Hume disparaged causal powers as mysterious, thus undermining the conception of the four causes. Kantian and utilitarian ethics argued that duties to humanity rather than happiness were the proper norms for action. By the beginning of the twentieth century, Aristotle looked not particularly relevant to modern philosophical concerns.
The latter part of the twentieth century, however, has seen a slow but steady intellectual shift, which has led to a large family of neo-Aristotelian positions being defended by contemporary philosophers. Modern relativism and nihilism on this view are products of the correct realization that without anyone making moral commandments, there is no reason to follow them.
Since virtue ethics grounds morality in states of character rather than in universal rules, only a return to virtue ethics would allow for a morality in a secular society. In accordance with this modern turn to virtue ethics, neo-Aristotelian theories of natural normativity have increasingly been defended, for example, by Thompson Cartwright and Pemberton revive the concept of natural powers being part of the basic ontology of nature, which explain many of the successes of modern science.
Umphrey argues for the real existence of natural kinds, which serve to classify material entities. These philosophers argue that, far from being useless antiques, Aristotelian ideas offer fruitful solutions to contemporary philosophical problems. Justin Humphreys Email: jhh sas. Aristotle B. The basic form of the Aristotelian syllogism involves a major premise, a minor premise, and a conclusion, so that it has the form If A is predicated of all B, And B is predicated of all C, Then A is predicated of all C.
Induction, Experience, and Principles Whenever a speaker reasons from premises, an auditor can ask for their demonstration. Rhetoric and Poetics Just as dialectic searches for truth, Aristotelian rhetoric serves as its counterpart Rhet. Biology The phenomenon of life, as opposed to inanimate nature, involves distinctive types of change Phys. Practical Philosophy Practical philosophy is distinguished from theoretical philosophy both in its goals and in its methods.
Habituation and Excellence Though the original meaning of ethics has been obscured due to modern confusion of pursuing proper ends with following moral rules, in the Aristotelian works, ethical inquiry is limited to the investigation of what it is for a human being to flourish according to her own nature. Ethical Deliberation Human action displays excellence only when it is undertaken voluntarily, that is, is chosen as the means to bring about a goal wished for by the agent.
Self and Others Life will tend to go well for a person who has been habituated to the right kinds of pleasures and pains and who deliberates well about what to do. Abbreviations a. Categoriae Categories Int. Liber de interpretatione On Interpretation AnPr. Analytica priora Prior Analytics AnPo. Analytica posteriora Posterior Analytics Phys. Physica Physics Met. Metaphysica Metaphysics Meteor.
De Memoria On Memory Sens. Politica Politics Top. Topica Topics Rhet. Rhetorica Rhetoric Poet. Poetica Poetics SophElen. De Sophisticiis Elenchiis Sophistical Refutations b. References and Further Reading a. Edited by A. Bekker, Clarendon, Complete Works of Aristotle. Edited by J. Barnes, Princeton University Press, Secondary Sources i. Life and Early Works Bos, A. Chroust, A-H. H, , pp.
Fine, G. On Ideas. Oxford University Press, Jaeger, W. Aristotle: Fundamentals of the History of His Development. Kroll, W. VI, part I. Berolini, typ. Reimeri, Lachterman, D. Owen, G. Strawson, Oxford University Press, , pp. Pistelli, H. Iamblichi Protrepticus. Lipsiae: In Aedibus B. Tubneri, Leiden: Brill, Cook Wilson, J. Statement and Inference, vol.
Clarendon, Groarke, L. Ierodiakonou, K. Avgelis and F. Peonidis, Thessaloniki, , pp. Lukasiewicz, J. Malink, M. Harvard University Press, Theoretical Philosophy Anscombe, G.
Three Philosophers. Cornell University Press, Bianchi, E. The Feminine Symptom. Fordham University Press, Boeri, M. Some Remarks on a Complicated Issue. Psychological Issues in Plato and Aristotle, edited by M.
Boeri, Y. Kanayama, and J. Mittelmann, Springer, , pp. Boylan, M. Cook, K. Hoinski, D. Humphreys, J. Ibn Bjjah. Translated by M. Ibn Rushd. Long Commentary on the De Anima of Aristotle. Translated by R. Taylor, Yale University Press, Jiminez, E.
0コメント